IPVectors
IPVerifier · support

Licensing, keys and quotas — and what to do when something is wrong.

This page answers the questions the Marketplace listing cannot: which AI provider keys IPVerifier needs, where to get each one, what a test licence covers, how quotas work, and how your keys are handled. Installation and your first audit are covered on the user guide; this page picks up where the cost and licensing questions begin.

Last updated: October 30, 2026 · For IPVerifier 1.0.1

Three questions, three places to look.

Most of what people arrive needing is already written down. This saves you reading the wrong page.

Installing, or running your first audit?

Install from the Marketplace, the four steps of an audit, how to read a banded verdict, and sample reports you can download and read before setting anything up.

User guide

Something is behaving oddly?

A stale task pane, a jump that did not land, an audit that refused to run, progress bars that stopped. The six usual causes and their fixes are listed with the guide.

Troubleshooting

Keys, licences, quotas or billing?

What you must supply, what we supply, who you pay, what a test licence covers and what happens when it runs out. That is the rest of this page.

Keep reading

Two ways to run IPVerifier

IPVerifier is free to install. What costs money is the reasoning behind an audit, because an audit calls several independent AI providers for every assertion it checks. There are two ways that gets paid for, and which one applies to you depends only on what you are auditing.

Test licences — evaluationWe supply the AI capacity so you can run the sample reports we provide and see a real verdict. Nothing to buy, nothing to configure.
Your own keys — everything elseTo audit your own analysis, you supply your own accounts with the AI providers. You pay them directly, at their rates.

Test licences, in plain terms

So that you can evaluate IPVerifier without opening accounts anywhere, we let you run sample reports we provide on our own AI capacity. Three things are worth knowing before you rely on it:

  • They work only inside IPVerifier, and only on the sample reports provided for that purpose — not on a document of your own.
  • They are capped per account. The current limit is stated in section 6 of the EULA, which is the one place we keep it up to date. Unused runs have no value and do not roll over.
  • They are a courtesy, not an entitlement. The credentials are held on our service and are never issued to you, and we can change or withdraw the limit.

If you want to see IPVerifier work on your material without setting anything up, you do not need keys for that either — send us a document and we will run the audit and send the report back, usually within two business days. How that works. Please send non-confidential material only.

The keys you need, and where to get each one

An audit is adversarial by construction: separate providers argue the opposite sides of every assertion and a different one decides. That independence is the whole point — no model grades its own work — and it is why IPVerifier asks for more than one account rather than one.

ProviderWhy IPVerifier needs itWhere to create a key
Anthropic
Claude
One of the two voices that argue the assertion, and the stronger reader of long source text. console.anthropic.com
Google
Gemini
Reconciles the two arguments into the verdict you read. Without it no verdict can be issued at all, so this one is not optional. aistudio.google.com/apikey
xAI
Grok
The adversarial voice — its job is to attack the analysis and surface every assertion the source does not actually support. console.x.ai
OpenAI
GPT
An independent fourth voice on findings the others dispute. Optional, and worth having on anything you will file or send to a client. platform.openai.com/api-keys

Each one is a normal developer account: sign up, add a payment method, create a key, paste it into IPVerifier. You will typically need to put a small amount of credit on each account before its key will answer — a key with no credit behind it is valid and still fails, which is the single most common setup problem we see.

Minimum, and what we recommend

SetWhat you getSuitable for
Minimum
Google + one of Anthropic or xAI
A verdict, with one side of the argument and a judge. It will run, and it will catch unsupported assertions. Trying it on your own material. Not work you will hand to someone else.
Recommended
Google + Anthropic + xAI
Both sides argued by different providers, reconciled by a third. This is the configuration the published audits were run under. Day-to-day review.
Full
All four
Adds an independent fourth voice on disputed findings. Anything you will file, or sign your name to for a client.
Why not just one provider? Because a single model checking its own reasoning is the problem IPVerifier exists to solve, not a cheaper version of the solution. Drop providers and the audit still runs, but the claim you can make about it weakens in a specific way — fewer independent voices, and in the minimum set, only one side of the argument. The pane tells you which voices were available on every run, and the signed record says so too, so a thin run can never be mistaken for a full one after the fact.

Quotas, limits and who you pay

On test licencesOn your own keys
Who you payNobody.Each AI provider, directly, at their published rates. IPVectors does not mark up, resell or meter your usage.
What limits youA per-account run cap set by us. See the EULA.Whatever credit and rate limits you hold with each provider.
When you hit itAudits stop. Add your own keys to continue.That provider's calls start failing. The pane names the provider so you know which account to top up.
What you can auditSample reports we provide, only.Your own analysis, and additional sample runs you request.

Before a run starts, the pane shows a pre-flight estimate of what that audit will cost in provider calls, so you can see the size of a job before committing to it rather than after.

How your keys and documents are handled

  • Keys are stored encrypted and used only to perform the operations you ask for inside IPVerifier. They are never echoed back to the screen once saved.
  • You can remove them at any time, and removal takes effect immediately.
  • Your relationship with each provider is yours. You are responsible for your keys and for what those providers charge; we are not a party to it, and we cannot see your bills.
  • Your source material is never used to train models. What leaves your machine is governed by the EULA and the privacy policy.
  • Audits are bound to the open document. Findings and jumps land in that exact file, which is why we say to audit the report of record rather than a scratch copy.

The authoritative text is sections 6 and 7 of the EULA. Where this page and the EULA ever differ, the EULA governs.

If you also want Reporter

IPVerifier audits an analysis. It does not produce one. Reporter is the other half: it starts from your invention rather than your keywords, searches patents and the published literature across jurisdictions, and produces the analysis that IPVerifier then puts on trial.

Reporter runs in two modes, and choosing the wrong one is the most common early mistake:

ModeThe question it answersUse it for
LandscapeWho is working in this space, and where is the white space? Competitive intelligence, portfolio mapping, R&D direction, M&A diligence.
Prior artCould this invalidate my claim? Invalidity contentions, freedom-to-operate, IPR and PGR preparation, pre-litigation assessment.

They are not two templates over one pipeline. Prior-art mode applies a hard priority-date gate — anything published on or after your subject's filing date is removed before scoring, because it cannot anticipate your invention — and scores for whether a reference discloses your specific claim elements. Landscape mode applies no date gate on purpose, and scores for technical overlap instead, because a patent filed last year is exactly what you want to see in a competitive read.

Reporter is not sold through the Marketplace and is not self-serve. Access is by request, and we will walk you through what it needs. Ask about Reporter.

What is CPARS?

CPARS is the Canonical Prior-Art Report Schema — the strict, validated format Reporter writes its findings into and IPVerifier reads them out of. It is the contract between the two halves.

You will see the name in report metadata and in the signed audit record, so it is worth knowing why it exists. A schema means every finding carries the same fields in the same shape every time: the claim element, its status, the verbatim passage offered as evidence, and where that passage came from. That is what makes an audit checkable rather than merely readable — an auditor can recompute the deterministic parts of a score from the record itself, and a run can be repeated and compared against an earlier one. A report that was free-form prose could be read, but it could not be re-examined this way.

The schema is versioned, and the version is written into every report, so a record stays interpretable after the format moves on.

What you actually receive

  • A banded verdict for every audited section — green, amber or red — each finding carrying the passage it rests on, with the dissent left visible rather than smoothed away.
  • A signed, hash-chained audit record you can retain for provenance.
  • A review-ready Legal Case Brief, curated from the blocks you decide to keep.
  • History — every completed audit is recorded and can be reopened.

Three real reports, unedited apart from a sample notice, are on the guide page if you would rather read finished output than a description of it: a claim-centric §103 report, a provenance appendix, and a prior-art report. Download the samples.

If you would like to watch a report being read and worked through rather than read one yourself, the full sessions are in the film room, by invitation.

Questions we are asked

The Marketplace listing says “Additional purchase may be required.” What does that mean?

It means IPVerifier itself is free to install, but running audits on your own material needs your own accounts with the AI providers listed above. You pay those providers directly. There is no IPVectors subscription, licence fee or per-audit charge.

Can I try it without opening any accounts?

Yes. Install it and run the sample reports we provide on our test licences — no keys, nothing to configure, capped per account. Or send us a non-confidential document and we will run the audit for you and send the report back.

I entered a key and it was accepted, but audits still fail on that provider.

Almost always credit rather than the key. A valid key on an account with no credit or no entitlement for the model returns a permission error, not an authentication error, so the key tests as real while the call still fails. Add credit on that provider's own billing page and try again. The pane names which provider failed.

Do I have to supply all four providers?

No. Google is required, because without it no verdict can be issued. Beyond that, more providers means more independent voices and a stronger claim about the result — see the minimum, recommended and full sets above.

Can I remove my keys later?

Yes, at any time, and it takes effect immediately. Removing them does not delete your audit history.

Is my document used to train AI models?

No. Your source material is never used to train models. What leaves your machine is covered by the EULA and the privacy policy.

Can I run it on a confidential or privileged matter?

That is your call to make against your own obligations, and audits do run on the IPVectors cloud rather than on your machine — so read the privacy policy and the EULA first. For anything you send us to run on your behalf, send non-confidential material only.

Which versions of Word does it work in?

Word 2013 and later on Windows, Word 2016 and later on Mac, Word on the web, and Word in Microsoft 365 on both platforms. It runs as a task pane beside your document and needs an internet connection, because audits run on the IPVectors cloud.

The reference I need to check is in another language.

It needs a verifiable translation first. Produce one in the translation tab and have your expert attest it; the audit then runs against the attested text and records that it did so.

Is IPVectors a law firm?

No. IPVectors is not a law firm, does not provide legal advice, and is not registered to practise before the USPTO. IPVerifier supports the professional who signs the work; it does not replace them, and every conclusion belongs to the attorney who signs it.

Still stuck? Write to support@ipvectors.com and include two things: the build stamp from the bottom of the task pane, and the subject patent number. That pair is usually enough for us to answer without a back-and-forth. Marketplace, licensing and press enquiries reach the same inbox — say which in the subject line and it is routed.

IPVectors Inc. is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. IPVerifier supports the professional who signs the work; it does not replace them.